My Classroom Environment and Problem-Solving Strategies
I like to think of my classroom as one that is structured
yet allows for flexibility. Everything
has a place and every person knows the procedures that are to be followed in
their daily routine, whether it is picking up their portfolios from the back counter
at the start of class, or the last period of the day putting all the chairs up
on the desks. Having this bit of
structure, something that every student can always count on occurring daily
provides stability to my students that might not have it anywhere else. I enforce the procedural structure with
rewards, such as candy and music, and punish any students who do not follow the
structure with extra tasks, such as sweeping the floor or reorganizing the
books.
Beyond the daily routines, I approach my classroom as an
environment that allows for students to express themselves through artwork
that, within the structure of the projects, allows for much freedom and
choice. They create their own
compositions, pick their own still-life objects or subject matter, and have
choice between at least two media for each project. Providing them these forced choices allows
for them to feel as if they have some control over what they are doing,
therefore they have the desire how to learn the best ways to mix paint because
they WANT to know how to paint.
So many students enter my classroom saying that they cannot
draw or that they are not creative, yet I always tell them that they can! Practice makes perfect, and yes you can learn
to draw and drastically improve your skills through simple techniques. I always show them two drawings of Van Gogh,
both of a man, two years apart, having them recognize the obvious improvement
in proportion, spatial relationships, and form.
These images are inspiration for my students to start the class. I always keep one of their first projects to
show them how far they have come and how much they have learned not only about the
creation of art, but artists, the materials, and the use of correct
terminology.
Taking the high school case study into consideration, I
would handle the situation in the following ways. Firstly, I would speak with
each student individually and after class (dependingly, I would call them out
of their next class to come talk with me).
I will let them know that their behavior is not acceptable behavior for
a student of their age and maturity and that they know better. I would let them know how disappointed I am
in them and ask them how they think they should be behaving. If they do not provide suggestions, I will
provide my opinion and ask whether that seems acceptable. I would reiterate that in their final grade
is a percentage that goes toward participation, and currently they were failing
that section. With their other grades
taken into consideration, and I am making an assumption that with their severe
case of “senioritis,” that they would be barely squeaking by, I would let them
know that they could potential fail this class and that would keep them from
graduating since they are required to have a Fine Art elective to
graduate. I would also let them know
that I would be speaking that day with the other two students and let them know
that tomorrow in class I expected them to behave appropriately or there would
be consequences, including calling their parents, creating a new seating
arrangement, in-class chores, after-school detention with cleaning duties,
etc. I would also ask for their input:
Why are you acting this way? What do you
want to be doing in this class? Is there
a different assignment you’d be interested in? Based on what they tell me, I
would create an assignment that they would find more engaging, yet still
relevant to the standards I was teaching.
I especially like in the intervention continuum that you would try to find the reason for their acting out. I wonder what else you could do in your classroom - is there any way that your learning theory might influence your choices?
ReplyDelete